|  | 
| Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
|  | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
 | 
| 
 | |||||||
| Lenses Discussion of Lenses | 
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Mpe 65 
			
			Hello im brand new to this forum, Hopefully some one can help me with this. i own a Nikon D90 and very interested in macro and was just wondering is there a nikon equivalent to the Canon MPE 65 macro lens?? cheers | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			In a word... No. The only way to go below 1:1 with a Nikon (as far as I know) is to use tubes or bellows. Though I probably should have started by saying welcome to WPF   
				__________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/37669825@N04/ | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			oh thats a bit of a blow, never mind. ive got a set of tubes at the moment but i want to keep the working distance. Thank you for the reply tho, like the pictures on your website also
		 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 On full frame cameras the lens on its own only does 1:2 macros (1/2 size) but add one 52mm 500D and you have 1:1 (life size) macros with virtually no noticable difference in optical performance or brightness. Add a second and you get 2:1 macros (2x life size), again with virtually no noticable difference in optical performance or brightness. Obviously you can use a combination of tubes and 500D's to get even higher magnifications but unlike the 500D's, adding tubes does lose you a few stops. | 
|  | 
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| 
 | 
 |