![]() |
Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm a little bit confused about resampling. I'd like to size down but want to maintain or increase the resolution by keeping the maximum number of pixels. Normally I size down to 1000 by whatever before I post pictures here with the resample box checked in PS7. That results in fewer pixels. How do other people do it? I can reduce the image size ( by changing dimensions) with resample unchecked and that maintains the number of pixels but that leaves images too big for the forum. Is there some sort of compromise?
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I check the "resample" box. For viewing on a screen on a web page the loss of quality isn't noticable. I resize to 1024x whatever and then adjust the jpeg compression to give a file size ideally no more than 150K. If this means I have to use a lot of compression I "undo" the earlier resize, resize to 800x whatever and then save again. I think this gives a good compromise between file size and quality. Sometimes I have to push the file size up a bit higher (such as my Ely Cathedral 2 picture) but this is rare.
Duncan |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So you'll just have to throw away them pixels.
__________________
Frank Hollis Canon 2oD owner |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks, guys. Your comments are helpful.
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|